Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx

    16,3K views

    Mostra di più

    Video screenshots

    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 1
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 2
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 3
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 4
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 5
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 6
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 7
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 8
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 9
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 10
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 11
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 12
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 13
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 14
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 15
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 16
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 17
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 18
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 19
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 20
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 21
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 22
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 23
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 24
    • Softcore! -1 anniversario e 3k abbonati speciale - mkx snapshot 25

    MKX proudly presents: "SEEDS"(aka Seeds of Sin) . An Underground Masterpiece from 1968. "...a family reunion over Christmas reignites long simmering tensions and rekindles dangerous sexual affairs..."

    Pubblicato da Original-1970-USA

    Commenti
    9
    Please or to post comments
    Random_User_Reviews
    8/10
    Have yourself a miserable Andy Milligan Christmas
    Woodyanders26 December 2017
    Warning: Spoilers
    A rotten dysfunctional family of bitter, bickering, back-stabbing folks gather together to celebrate Christmas. The reunion naturally sets everybody against each other as everyone's worst secrets are exposed. The situation comes to a deadly head when a mysterious killer starts bumping people off.

    Notorious Do-It-Your indie exploitation filmmaker Andy Milligan lets his trademark misanthropy and debauchery run rampant in this movie: Leave it to Milligan to populate the seamy story with a rich array of horrible individuals who include a nasty crippled alcoholic matriarch (played with unsparing harshness by Maggie Rogers), a brother and sister who had an incestuous affair as k1ds, a shady overcharging doctor, a hypocritical pedoph1le priest (an excellent performance by Neil Flanagan), a pair of scheming live-in servants, a p4thetic h0m0sexual, a snarky stuck-up blonde, and a brazen strumpet. Milligan captures the anguish and suffering of these colorfully awful characters with such merciless acuity that in a way it's a relief that the bulk of them meet brutal untimely ends. Moreover, Milligan tosses in a handy helping of gratuitous female nudity and sordid soft-core sex for sleazy good measure. A deliciously depraved doozy.
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    9/10
    Rough around the edges, but interesting nonetheless
    MikeJackKearney11 February 2002
    Say what you want about Andy Milligan - but if his family was even 10% as deranged as the one in this film, well then I guess he could have turned out worse. Unfortunately, the video print of this film contains sex scene inserts originally shot by the distributor to boost the picture's box office appeal. Several times during the film Milligan's ugly camerawork and silent film music abruptly ends, and suddenly good-looking stand-ins for Milligan's homely actors take over and start doing it to psychedelic 60's guitar rock. It's pretty easy to fast-forward through if you're trying to pay attention to Milligan's original film, which, unfortunately, is missing quite a bit of action that was cut to make room for the added sex scenes. What remains, however, is still compelling stuff. I don't think I've ever seen a more hateful mother in any film before.
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    6/10
    Insult to Injury
    Flixer195723 August 2002
    Warning: Spoilers
    **Possible Spoilers**

    A recently re-discovered black and white murder melodrama, shot in the same Staten Island house where THE GHASTLY ONES was made (I recognized the tacky wallpaper) and featuring it's star, Maggie Rogers. This time she plays an alcoholic old biddy whose twisted daughter (Candy Hammond) holds a family reunion without her permission. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want a family like this around either; they're the worst bunch of liars, thieves, arsonists, psychos, satyrs, nymphos and all-around perverts ever congregated under one roof. Various siblings lust for each other, even as they despise each other. One of them is also a killer and various victims are electrocuted, hacked, stabbed and strangled. One woman has her face eaten away by acid (no home should be without it) in one of Andy's goriest scenes ever. A victim in a wheelchair is rolled down a staircase–a startling scene, but Richard Widmark did it better in KISS OF DEATH. Milligan's sordid story on it's own should have been enough to please sleaze-hounds but it's prefaced and punctuated by near-hardcore sex scenes -- 21 minutes worth altogether--featuring actors not related to anything else in the picture. These inserts feature primitive Sixties "mod" music rather than Milligan's peculiar library music, are garishly lit and were obviously shot by someone else. They destroy whatever sense SEEDS OF SIN might have had and their only purpose, other than padding out this feature, is to demonstrate why the fast-forward button was invented. Milligan regular Neil Flanagan (GURU THE MAD MONK!) appeared in trailers to this film but not the padded, re-edited version just discovered by Something Weird Video. While I'm always grateful when one of Milligan's rarities surfaces, I would have liked to have seen this picture as he intended it. Previews for GURU THE MAD MONK, LOVE HUNGER and other obscurities appear at the end of the tape. There's even a trailer for SEEDS OF SIN, showing scenes that were cut out of the re-edited print. Talk about adding insult to injury..
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    6/10
    Watch the Milligan sample reel in the extras
    doug1963-178-18259723 December 2012
    If you really want to see what Milligan intended, skip the main film. It is cluttered with boring softcore inserts that are tedious. Seeds is an interesting film about a dysfunction family gathered for Christmas as the home of an almost insane Matriarch (Maggie Rogers) One of the family is killing off the family. It's a crude but fascinating look at palpable hate and loathing. There is not one character who is a positive person the viewer can like. One character, Carol, is interestingly played by Candy Hammond, who was briefly married to Milligan. As mentioned, the producers, concerned the film was too dark and not sexy enough, all true, inserted the straight, boring softcore stuff. It doesn't come close to matching the characters. As mentioned, go to extras and watch the Milligan print; you'll see a unique film that's not for all tastes but is a great sampling of Milligan's art.
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    6/10
    Ugly people doin' ugly things.
    ninjas-r-cool23 February 2011
    Warning: Spoilers
    Unlikeable characters. Seems like that's the one thing many people nowadays just can't tolerate in movies. Well, if you're the kind that prefers their characters to be warm, fuzzy and lovable, then stay right the hell away from this flick. In fact, you may as well just stop reading now. There's nothing you'll enjoy in this movie. Trust me. For here we have an early foray into the seriously unpleasant world of Andy Milligan. A world totally devoid of any kind of positivity towards or from the human race.

    Of all the holidays, Christmas might be the one that most revolves around family. Seeds of Sin begins with young wackjob Carol gathering the family together at Mother's house for Christmas lunch. Whilst most families spend this occasion catching up, getting plastered and eating til they can't move, this particular dysfunctional family express their feelings through lies, emotional blackmail and abuse, both verbal and physical. Not to mention that one of them is going around trimming the family tree via electrocution, poison, acid to the face and other atypical Christmas activities. This mob are all spiteful, selfish creatures who utterly despise each other, even the married couples. The only two who show any fondness at all are the brother and sister who've been having sex since they were teens....
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    ...Worst of all is the family matriarch, a wheelchair bound lush who constantly guzzles booze, spews bile at the fruit of her loins and breaks stuff in tantrums. Her vile behaviour reaches its pinnacle when she taunts her youngest son about his failed suicide attempt, encouraging him to try harder next time. Almost certainly based on Milligan's own mother, she's one of the most repulsive characters you'll ever see.

    No doubt a little taken aback by Milligan's relentless negativity, the producers of the film decided to splice in softcore sex scenes at inappropriate times. Fortunately it's done quite seamlessly. You can barely notice the change in film quality (the porn scenes are actually of higher quality than the film itself). Nor will you notice that the porn involves new actors with little resemblance to their non-porn counterparts. And it's quite difficult to fault the way the movie's dramatic classical score is often cut off MID-NOTE and replaced with stereotypical porno music, complete with groovy bass line and even a touch of wah-wah. Yep, the producers had total respect for Milligan's dark vision. (/sarcasm)

    Taken as a whole, this all adds up to quite a bizarro oddity from an era and niche world of filmmaking that we'll never see again. However, if you disregard the crappy porn scenes, you have possibly the ultimate anti-Christmas movie; a vicious glob of hate from one of cinema's most misanthropic miserablists. If you can handle Z-grade movies with a budget in the hundreds of dollars, then maybe give it a shot. Just don't expect to like anyone in it.
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    3/10
    Yeah it's bad but has some moments--dramatic and sexual
    preppy-324 December 2010
    A HEAVILY dysfunctional family gets together for the holidays. This leads to multiple murders (all badly done) and quite a few sex inserts that feature none of the original cast! This was originally shot as a straight-forward exploitation film with little skin. The producers saw it and decided to change it. They cut out key scenes that explained the plot, inserted some seriously terrible music that occasionally drowns out the actors dialogue, inserted some soft core sex scenes (seemingly at random) with two people who aren't even in the movie! They turned what MIGHT have been an OK movie into an incomprehensible mess. Still the script (or what's left of it) isn't bad, the acting is pretty good (even though some actors REALLY chew the scenery) and a lot of dramatic sequences really work. However the sex scenes the producers inserted pop up all over the place and go on for up to 5 minutes! The two actors (a guy and a girl) ARE attractive and have nice bodies so they're not a chore the watch...but their scenes totally destroy the flow of the story. So what's left is what might have been a pretty good film destroyed by editing and inserting pointless sex. A 3.
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    7/10
    Surprisingly good! Miles better than Blood Rites...
    The_Void20 October 2006
    I saw this film as it was the second feature on a disc containing the previously banned Video Nasty 'Blood Rites'. As Blood Rites was entirely awful, I really wasn't expecting much from this film; but actually, it would seem that trash director Andy Milligan has outdone himself this time as Seeds of Sin tops Blood Rites in style and stands tall as a more than adequate slice of sick sixties sexploitation. The plot is actually quite similar to Blood Rites, as we focus on a dysfunctional family unit, and of course; there is an inheritance at stake. The film is shot in black and white, and the look and feel of it reminded me a lot of the trash classic 'The Curious Dr Humpp'. There's barely any gore on display, and the director seems keener to focus on sex, with themes of incest and hatred seeping through. The acting is typically trashy, but most of the women get to appear nude at some point and despite a poor reputation, director Andy Milligan actually seems to have an eye for this sort of thing, as many of the sequences in this film are actually quite beautiful. The plot is paper thin, and most of the film is filler; but the music is catchy, and the director also does a surprisingly good job with the sex scenes themselves, as most are somewhat erotic. Overall, this is not a great film; but it's likely to appeal to the cult fan, and gets a much higher recommendation than the better known and lower quality 'Blood Rites'.
    Rispondi
    Random_User_Reviews
    4/10
    For Milligan fans only
    dbborroughs26 August 2007
    Dysfunctional family goes home for the holidays and murder and mayhem result. Violent sexy Milligan at his most home made. Little better than a home movie (as much of Milligans films are) this is a trip into depravity 1960's style. Notable for the copious nudity and sex this film is neither sexy nor gruesome, playing now more as quaint.(though decidedly r rated). The film suffers from its uneven cast and from the cheapness of the production.(No one was ever sure where the money went on his movies since he was always broke). Its a bad bad movie thats not worth seeing except as a Milligan completeist or because its got some good looking people fooling around.
    Rispondi